Court Bars EFCC From Arresting Mbadugha, SAN Over Professional Services

Court Bars EFCC From Arresting Mbadugha, SAN Over Professional Services

A Federal High Court sitting in Abuja, has barred the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) from arresting and detaining a Senior Advocate of Nigeria, Prof. Joseph Mbadugha (SAN) over deposition contained in an affidavit in a case involving Innosen Nigeria Limited.

Justice Inyang Ekwo specifically granted an order for the “maintenance of status quo ante bellum as at February 7, 2022, in favour of the Applicant” (Prof Joseph Nwabueze Mbadugha, SAN), over matters “which he knows nothing about, or facts to the like effect, pending the hearing and determination of the substantive originating motion.”

Nigerians can now work and earn dollars DAILY from home. Regular individuals can earn as low as €266.04 daily Find out how it works.

Mbadugha had through his counsel and human rights activist, Chief Mike Ozekhome, SAN, urged the court to restrain the EFCC from inviting, arresting, or detaining and keeping in custody, the Applicant over some frivolous allegations made against him concerning a case he handled and won for his client, Innoson Nigeria Ltd, from the High Court, through the Court of Appeal and now at the Supreme Court.

Chief Ozekhome explained that the appeal at the Supreme Court was at the instance of some Appellants, including Guaranty Trust Bank PLC (GTB), which had lost the in both lower courts.

During the court proceedings, Ozekhome, argued that the EFCC does not have the legal competence to compel Prof Mbadugha to disclose the source of information regarding an affidavit filed during the proceedings in 2011, as that is unconstitutional, illegal, wrongful ,overreaching and is capable of prejudicing the appeal at the Supreme Court.

He also argued that it was wrong for the EFCC, on the instigation of Guarantee Trust Bank PLC, and others, to serially invite Mbadugha, first on the 1st, then 7th and again on February 21, 2022, for the purpose of forcing him to disclose the source of his information in an affidavit filed and argued in court in the course of his strictly professional duties.

The activist lawyer complained that his client had earlier been detained between 11am and 6pm on the 1st of February, 2022, and told to report again on the 7th, and later, 21st of February, 2022.

He further submitted that his client was subjected to mental torture, with attempts at further arrest and detention, including unsolicited calls by the EFCC and its operatives, without any attempt at arraigning him before a court of law, in clear breach of the Applicant’s fundamental human rights enshrined in section 35(1) of the 1999 Constitution and Articles 5 and 6 of the African Charter on Human and Peoples Rights (Ratification and Enforcement) Act, Cap A9, Laws of the Federation of Nigeria, 2004.

After listening to his submissions, Justice Ekwo granted the order for maintenance of status quo ante bellum from February 7, 2022.

The EFCC was represented in court by Attah Ochibi, Martins Abang appeared for Guaranty Trust Bank (GTB), while Maliki Sylvanus and Queen Umana held Chief Ozekhome’s brief the Applicant.

The Respondents agreed that the processes had been served on them, but requested for five days each to respond to same.

While granting the Respondent’s request, Justice Ekwo warned that none of the parties before the court must take any further steps in the matter, including inviting or re-arresting the Applicant.

The court also granted accelerated hearing and subsequently adjourned the matter to March 29, 2022, for hearing.

Share This


Wordpress (0)
Disqus (0 )